1 Comment

My Moscovit friend Вячислав writes me:

“So let me continue our discussions about the Russia-Europe dialogue and cooperation.

Firstly i’m glad that the most of Europeans (as i think) are ready to accept Russians as europeans, but unfortunatelly have to admit, that not all the russians are looking forward to realize themselves as a part of Europe. I mean biologically of course, but there’s also quite strong influence and traditions of Moscovia political system, that was oriented to the east Roman Empire, the Byzantium, and was kind of against west Roman Empire, the Vatican, most Crusaders, then Catholics and Protestants. So unfortunatelly, the orthodox church in Russia was one of the main reasons for Russia to oppose the Western Europe. That was the time, when the idea of Russia as a separate civilization, the succesor of the East Roman Empire, Byzantium, and all the Orthodox Christian world. By the 18-19 centuries this idea has lost it’s actuality and Russia had absolutely European self-consciousness, as a 100% European Country and Nation, even one of the leaders of those time Europe. But the damn revolution and the rule of judeo-bolsheviks has raisen up again the idea of distance from Europe (as Capitalists, enemies of marxism and the world communism revolution) and began to orient more to other countries of socialist (marxist) camp. Most of those countries were in Asia, Africa, Latin America, so biologically-foreign people were told us to be closer and more friendlier, then our european brothers. The thing i want to say, that unfortunatelly these separatic-from-Europe ideas are still quite strong, especially among commies (we have them still these days, that’s not so strange, people just remember, that they had lived much better while the communists, than these days) and among religious orthodoxes (there are also plenty of them). So of course here i am struggling for our common European origin and Civilization-belonging. So here it’s even a stronger front of work for the Russian-European unity, than in European countries, which still look at the side of Russia with mixed feelings of interest, fear, friendship and caution (and i can understand them absolutely). So of course my dream is in White Europe Rise together with Russia envolved, the return of natural values, civilizational and biological self-consciousness of Europeans, and that the political system in Russia and Europe would turn in some compromising way. The ideal form for me – is the political system of modern European countries, Capitalist in general, but with a little socialistic orientation (as in Sweden), MINUS tolerance and ideological propaganda of race-mixing. In Russia people these days are still quite untolerant to everything they consider as unnatural, as gays, race-mixing and so on. Also Russians traditionally never trust jews and believe them to be treaters and enemies. That’s on one hand. But in another hand, in Russia there is still strong tolerance to the dictatorship and totalitarian rule of authorities. People don’t have strong political will to freedom. But they are always ready to fight in war with some foreign invaders.

In the Western Europe there’s a bit different situation (of course you know better, but i’ll tell how i see). The political system there is developed better, the democratic institutes actually work. The economy is also quite strong and stable. BUT! Europeans were made to accept tolerance, all those multi-culti ideas, and degenerational values, and they seem to accept them strongly, especially the younger generations, that just find all those things natural. So in these circumstances i find the way to our Civilization to survive – in combining the BEST sides of our countries – the more-or-less natural values and traditionalism of Russia and political system of Western Europe (of course with big corrections). Not as far as the whole political system, but the principles of People-Government relationships. I think in these case we could survive and get closer again (as we did originally).

So as for the Putin, actually his a horrible hideous bastard. His even much worse, than Jeltsin. He’s a KGB officer, so his a strong enemy of European Russia, he openly propagands the Eurasian ideology (by which Russia is oriented more to Asia, than to Europe). But that’s only theoretical aspect. The practical aspect, that he’s responsible for the genocide of Russian people, several million people died at the time of his rule (last 12 years) and all forms of life got worse. For him there’s absolutely no difference between the native people of Russia of the third country immigrants. He’s providing the policy of replacing native people with Asians and Caucasians. Even I remember times, when Russia was generally white, there were no immigrants or anytihng. These days there are catastrophically lots of them in EVERY city or even villages. And he supports their immigration here so much, that tey are given more rights, than Russian people have. He initiated the acceptance of damn laws 282 and 288, by which all people, that are unhappy with the immigrational policy are claimed as extremists. Immigrants from Caucasus and Asia are very agressive and conflict here, and when there are some fights or things of these kind with them and Russian people, the courts always sew Russian people (because the 288 law is used only against whites), and Caucasians usually can avoid going to jail even after killing some russian (because of their diaspora help and strongest supports of Putin’s party policy). First vice-president in Russia is Vladislav Surkov, but it’s a pseudo-name, his real name is Aslanbek Dudaev, a chechen maggot, who is the author of ideology of Putin’s party. And that party actually controls all spheres of political life – ministries, governemnt, parliament, courts, army and the police. That’s one of the reasons, why Chechens (especially)
and other Caucasians have so much rights, and their regions are 99% donors from the federal budget – they just pay them huge amounts of money to buy their friendship and make them stop the war actions. But this payment is made with our money and our blood. Kadyrov is Putin’s good friend and the absolutist president of Chechen republic and a former terrorist, has built a parasitic nationalistic country Chechnya, that does not need to work, or produce something, but it just lives for our expense. But Chechens for some reasons dont want to be in their republic and prefer to move to Moscow or St. Petersburg, where the only thing they can do is banditism with the support of their diasporas and local authorities. They are a huge problem, sub-human with more rights than we have. With Putin russian people have no chance to survive, he’s responsible for so lots of crimes, that it would be really unfair, if he died by natural death.

Excuse my radicalism and agression, but he’s 100% enemy.

Just to compare – before Putin there was only one historical Mosque in Moscow, toaday there are 8 mosques in Moscow. And no need to say, that about 13 population of Moscow are different sorts of bio-foreigners, mostly muslims.

By the way he’s also a big friend of jews and zionists:

So ‘Russia without Putin’ is our only way to survive, but it doesnt seem, that he is ready to give up and take off the rule. He just strengthen his powers. Almost everybody here hates him, but for imigrants of course, and the oligarchs.

by the way, we are having an absolutely weird weather here. In december it’s usually a strong frosty winter already, with snow and so on. But there hasn’t been any signs of winter yet, it’s about +4+6 degrees, rains. A common winter weather in London. But not for us. It should be about -5 -10. Possibly the Global Warming is partly true. Most of the pictures i sent you were made last days, so it you can imagine how it looks like, not a gleam of winter.”

and he elaborates on this theme later (december 2011):

So I’ll try to make it a bit clearer with these names and organizations. First of all it is needed to describe the overall political situation in here. Russian political system these days is very much likely to the Soviet type. So actually it is absolutist and autoritarian. Russia is a presidential republic, so the most powerfull figure in political life is president. Putin used to be a president twice, and as far as can’t officially be the president for the third time in row, he placed his marionet-figure Medvedev, so that to rule the country by just controlling him. It is obvious that medvedev doesn’t decide anything, or controlled, but is being controlled. His actual function is representative – like the Queen of Great Britain. And his main role – to keep the president’s chair for Putin, when he would be able to take it back constitutionally. So in march 2012 we have president elections, and be sure, that putin will “win” the elections, though everyone hates him. So going forward – Putin is a prime minster these days, so he sets the government and they totally depend on him. The next – parliament. Putin is the head of the “United Russia” party, that now has more than 60% of chairs in parliament, and that means – they have absolute monopoly in creating, providing and accepting laws. Just anyone they like. All courts, governal organizations and all other spheres of life are depended on that party and personally putin because people must be members of this party, to get administrative positions in these organizations. Another important branch of powers here – special bureaus like KGB. Today it’s called FSB. They are actually one of the strongest and most powerful structures in Russian political system. Their main task is to provide the current authorities’ safety from being changed. So they do everything, fight with opposition, creating their “false opposition” to create the vision of political life in Russia. No need to say, that FSB and all related structures are subordinated to Putin, as you know, he himself used to be a KGB officer, and a spy in after WW2 Germany. So that is the picture of political life. Everything is ruled straightly by Putin (or at least seems to, i don’t know, whom he could be subordinated to in secret). All other parties we have – communistic, democratic, socialist or so on, they all play absolutely zero role. All together they are less than Putin’s party, and if they try to make Putin less powerful, they could be forbidden with the help of corresponding laws, that Putin’s party has taken.

And all such organizations as Nashi, Stahl and others, they of course are the product of Kremlin propaganda. They are not organizations in common sense. They gather by a command when they are needed. Usually they are used to make fake demonstrations, pro-Putin and pro-authorities. They just invite some students, even school children, some retired people and just grown-up idiots, pay each of them about 6 euros for an hour for participating in demonstration, and then they just go home. So they are used as decorations for official TV reports. (all channels are controlled, we have no free TV or any mass media, except for some rare liberal media, that are financed from the west). In tv news they make a report about pro-authorities demonstration, that proves (how they think), that our people adore Vladimir Putin and the party. They same thing as in soviet times)

Jashin and Boris Nemtsov are actuall opposition. They are liberals. So Nemtsov is an experienced politician, that has never been more or less popular, but all the time tried to stay in political game. Jashin is just a live journal or twitter blogger, quite a popular. as we have no free media, facebook and twitter are the only ways for spreading information and news among people in mass. So he is quite a popular person among liberal or democratic bloggers, and he cooperates with Nemtsov these days. Both were envolved in anti-Putin demonstrations, that took place las weeks. Need to say, that those demonstrations were very popular among people. The main idea was to mention the unfair votes, and generally people’s tiredness and dislike of the present authorities, that hadn’t had changed for more than 12 years. Of course, Nashi organization didn’t take part in anti-Putin demonstration, they took part in the opposite pro-Putin demonstration, that was organized by Kremlin to show in TV. They just take some people, give them flags and banners, give some money and make a TV broadcast. And that’s their function. all those contesters are rarely more-or-less interested in politics and are unable to say, why are they supporting putin, just for quite a little sum of money. This time it was very funny, they took Asian imumigrants to the demonstration. it’s quite a famous photo, a Nashi pro-Putin demonstration in moscow.


And this is a foto of a anti-putin demonstration that took place this saturday. I’ve been there. I’ve never seen so Many people in one place. Just tremendous!

And wat’s interesting, people of different ideologies took part in the demonstration, liberals, communists, nationalists, antifa, sex-minorities, socialists and others, but all of them were white. And all they hated the Putin’s regime.

As for those liberals – Nemtsov, Javlinsky, they’ve never been popular in Russia, on of the reasons – their attitude to tolerance and other thing. pro-immigrational policy. Yes, and that they are believed to be Jewish. At least they dont seem Russian. But as for me, they are not so bad, at least they are pro-European, and are against this authorities, that are the worst, that ever could happen. Want to pay your attention to an interesting figure, who made quite much in organizing those demonstrations and anti-Putin propaganda – Alexey Navalny. He’s democratic oriented, pro-European and ethnically Russian (rare thing in politics haha). Also one very important thing – he’s mildly nationalist and anti-islamist. In legal forms. So I could be wrong, or don’t know some important things about him, but now he’s the only political figure in Russia, whom i respect and more or less trust.

One important figure that you mentioned is Vladislav Surkov. Vladislav Surkov is a pseudo-name, his real name is Aslanbek Dudaev, a Chechen. He’s Putin’s right hand and a very influential figure. He is the author of Kremlin’s ideology and he manages the inner-Russian policy. He is actually the reason why chechens are the most highly privileged people in Russia. The chechnya is actually an independent nationalistic islamist state, that provides nothing, but just lives on federal budget. And they are getting about 10 times more money from budget, than an average Russian state gets. And they get lots of quotes in the most prestigious russian universities, and so on. actually the Chechen mafia is very powerfull and cruel here. Try to imagine, that nowadays even tolerant liberals admit that Chechens are a huge problem. And having their own nationalistic and budget-feed state, they still prefer to move to Russian cities and the only way of living they know is banditism, so they cause lots of problems, but they are being taken care of and supported by kremlin (actually Surkov-Dudaev and Kadyrov personally). So when people are getting too angry with chechens and all sorts of others like Dagestanis and so on, they provide the anti-nationalistic campaign, as they say, and set in jail people, who says that Chechens and others must not live here.
There was also one funny moment. Chechnya is a region that makes no profit at all, no factories, nothing. There is a giantic unemployment, but still they have tremendous summs of money, they build the hugest mosques and their level of life is generally higher then Russian’s. So once a journalist asked Kadyrov (the president of Chechnya), where does Chechnya get money from. The answer was, that Allah himself gives money to Chechnya. So from that time, Surkov and Putin are often called “Allah”))) That’s a popular story here.

Most of others you mentioned are quite not famous or influential. Jakemenko is a leader of Nashi – Putin’s vassal. So his role just to lead the sheeps in demonstrations. He doesn’t actually has some power. G Kasparov yes, is a jewish politician and former chess-champion. He is from the circle of Nemtsov and Jashin. He’s absolutely not popular.

So that’s a small excursion to Russia’s political life from me) Actually the situation is quite sad. They will always force any kind of opposition and the will go on ruining my country and providing the genocide of Russians and replacing them with Chechens and Asians.

Yes, and as for the Russian March. Originally, it’s an annual demonstration of Russian right-winged nationalists, and supporters. It is held in the 4th of novembre. So this demonstration was usually banned, but still was held every year. Lots of people were arrested and some of them set in jail after those Russian Marches. As far as nationalistic ideas are popular among Russians, the Russian March was also quite popular, and more people joined it. In the beginning it was mostly consisted of skinheads, NS and such kind of people. But for the last years more common people join it, even veterans, different kinds of intelligent and succesful people.
So Nashi’s organized their own Russian March, to discreditise the original one. The real Russian March is held under the slogans of “Stop Immigration”, “Russia is for whites” and such of that kind, and Nashis’ “Russian march” is held under tolerant slogans as “Russia is for everyone”, “all people are equal”, “Stop racism” and so on. Actually their demonstration is not at all interesting or popular, but the same thing – this is made to show on tv, that only tolerant Russian march took place.


Leave a comment

Greece is super-rich in oil, natural gas, uranium, rare minerals etc etc. But the modern Greek state is not a Greek and it never was for that matter. It does not belong to the Greeks. It belongs to the crypto-jewish elite of Greece and to their co-religionists in New York . The wealth hiding in Greek underground has been known for decades (actually Herodotus mentions in his writings that oil comes out of the soil in several areas of Greece) but we were prohibited from extracting any of it. In fact until recently our governments have even refused to acknowledge that Greece has large oil deposits and they still refuse to acknowledge that large quantities of uranium exist in Northern Greece ( it was discovered as early as the 1940s). What happens now is the following: everyone knows Greece cannot pay off its debt. So it will eventually go bankrupt. Then Goldman Sachs and the other jewish institutions will come and buy everything in Greece including of course its minerals. That mentally handicapped jewish cockroach Papandreou was elected just to create the conditions for the imminent depredation of Greece.
Greece has a constantly shrinking native population of 9,000,000. At the same time it has a constantly growing population of illegal invaders close to 3,000,000. In other words as soon as the economy collapses Greece will be heading towards a colossal bloodbath.
Safe areas to buy land would be in the Eptanese island complex (the Ionian islands next to Italy) or Mani (Sparta) in Peloponnese (because the population there is right-wing and armed). Both areas have a considerable number of western Europeans (mainly Germans and British, though these two rarely mix and tend to live in different parts). Eptanese has more British, Mani more Germans.
Alexios Synodinos

interview by AV with prof Pavel Tulaev, English text+ video

Leave a comment


This is the translation of the Russian text as being sent in writing in advance of the actual interview. The English translation of the actual spoken text in the Russian interview is slightly different and shorter, which is published hereafter the pre-sent text, though the questions are the same as in the pre-sent text, kept in Russian. It has been added for legal reasons only. Under the video/audio section of this website (see buttom on top of homepage)a shortened and slightly different video-interview with Tulaev has been published.

augustus 28th, 2011
ALFRED VIERLING: Dear Mr. Tulaev, let me ask you a few questions?
PAVEL TULAEV: Yes, of course, Mr. Vierling. Welcome to Russia. I had a chance to read your publication ‘The Netherlands, a failed State in a failed Continent’ in the English-language journal «AB AETERNO», which deserves attention. I am happy to answer your questions.
ALFRED VIERLING: In 2050 , the peoples of European descent will be on the verge of extinction, forming less than 6% of the world’s population. The fertility rate in the European Union and Russia currently stands at 1.57 , while the replacement fertility rate, as rate required to stabilize the population is equal to 2.1 . And in the European Union and Russia alone there is a muslim population of about 30,000,000. Their birth rate being much higher. What do you think about these phenomena ?
PAVEL TULAEV: Yes, we know this sad statistic and dangerous trend. In the latest issue of “Athenaeum” I have been published demographic study of two Russian authors, entitled ”Do the indigenous peoples of Europe survive?”. This issue is constantly discussed in the pages of our publication.
ALFRED VIERLING: The European Union intends to add to this current Muslim immigration another 25 million Africans, while Russia, I think, intends to stop non-European immigration.
PAVEL TULAEV: You know better the plans of the European Union’s immigration policy. As for Russia, it is true, the government limited the number of quota on the entry of migrant workers from Asia. At the same time, it prohibited the Movement Against Illegal Immigration (DPNI), which initially opposed the colonization of the Russian people from the South East and Eurasia. The real situation is very dramatic.
ALFRED VIERLING: Is it true that the Russian government provides parents with about 18,000 (eighteen thousand) euros for each second or third child?
PAVEL TULAEV: Your information on government grants on the occasion of the second, third and subsequent children are not fully reliable. As far as I know, the amount of actual subsidies are much lower. Young families in the age of 30 receive a one-time assistance in 2007 about 1.5 thousand euros for the second child (60 thousand) and 2000 euros (85 thousand) for the third and following. Within a month of giving birth an employer must pay an allowance to care for a baby of around 400 euros. From the perspective of many mothers, such financial assistance is low. However it is important from a moral point of view. In Germany and the Nordic countries, there are similar subsidies.
ALFRED VIERLING: You are the author of “White Struggle in Russia” (Moscow, 2007). What did you write there?
PAVEL TULAEV: The book “White Struggle in Russia» , has been released in a small number of copies and is on display in PDF format on my personal site HYPERLINK “http://www.tulaev.ru” http://www.tulaev.ru. It is a collection of opinion articles and interviews published in English, French, German and Spanish. It is not about demographics and the philosophical-historical and ideological issues. Originally, I wanted to convey to our Western colleagues the thought that we, Russians, are as much white Europeans, as they are. We belong to one race, we have common roots, traditions, values and similar interests. Therefore, the existing differences, such as language or religion, should not interfere with understanding and lead to geopolitical conflicts between sister nations, as it was during the Second World War. My essays are on the meaning of the White Revival, counter to 1917 and beyond, including modernity of the XXI century, and the spiritual and cultural solve the problems, and are not anthropological research.
ALFRED VIERLING: Will Russia’s population, which is expected to re-establish be about 150 million in 2030, be able to serve as a reservoir population (Hinterland) and a source of inspiration for the endangered white people in the European Union?
PAVEL TULAEV: Your forecast of the growth of Russia’s population to 150 million in 2030 is unrealistic. First, official data on the 2010 census are strongly distorted. In fact, the number of Russian citizens is not 142 million, but much smaller. Experts call a number about a hundred million (to be specified). Over 20 years of liberal-capitalist reforms, the Russian population has lost in the order of 15 million people (the exact figure is discussed). With increased an mortality rate among Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians, simultaneously accompanied by a significant increase in fertility among the Armenians, Azerbaijanis, Chechens, Ingush, etc. Compensation for loss of the Slavic population of European origin, is due to the growth of Asians, Caucasians and Chinese. If this trend continues, in the long term it will significantly change the racial composition of the Russian citizens in the direction of East Asian and the Mongoloid will be dominant.
It is important to note that the quantitative reduction in population is accompanied by a general aging, degeneration, depravity and brainwashing under the influence of Western civilization. It is obvious deterioration in the quality of people, their health and moral character.
In this regard, philosophers and religious figures are reminiscent of the laws of the Kali Yuga, the era of total degradation, while state statisticians and demographers are recognizing the genocide.
Who could inspire such a reality? It remains to count on those devotees who go against the tide.
Civilization and Culture
ALFRED VIERLING: The European Union has been subordinated to the United States of America. It will be weakened by America’s “plague of pleasure,” which leads to the individualistic style of life of hic et nunc. In the interest of their Masonic lobby the U.S. is trying to weaken the euro-zone, preaching multiculturalism. This makes the population of European descent a minority in their own land, surrounded by a sea of Muslim and black immigrants. In connection with the rise of nationalist parties in all member states of the European Union recently such national leaders as Sarkozy in France, Merkel in Germany and Cameroon in Britain were forced to admit the failure of multicultural policy. However, after recognition, everything still remains the same like before.
So, can Russia offer an alternative to multiculturalism?
PAVEL TULAEV: We are attentively watching what is happening in the European Union and we hope for, eventually, a victory by common sense. Indigenous peoples have the right to a national environment. In this sense, Russia has something to offer as an alternative to the phenomenon which you call “multiculturalism.” After going through the experience of Soviet internationalism and cosmopolitanism, post-Soviet, the Russian people with the persistence of their home states cling to (native) culture against the influence of the globalist TV and the Internet. The current government recognizes the fundamental role of the Russian language and the importance of national culture, while simultaneously pursuing and blocking the Russian political parties for alleged extremism.
ALFRED VIERLING: What is the role of the Russian Orthodox Church in restoring the traditional way of family life and the revival of Russian civilization as a fundamental culture?
PAVEL TULAEV: The role of the Russian Orthodox Church in the life of modern Russia is significant. Among other religions, it is the dominant one in status and real impact, such as the Catholic Church in Europe. The church has taken a clear and active role in protecting the traditional family. It also affects the development of culture, seeing it from a Christian perspective. The greatest Russian philosophers of the XX century came from Orthodox values, and there is now a renaissance of religious culture, thousands of churches have been restored many thousands of copies published of Christian books, movies shot on a historical theme with a positive assessment of Orthodoxy. In this sense, the role of the Church – is consolidated. Moreover, its influence reaches beyond the borders of Russia and covers the territory of the former Russian Empire. It is evident in Belarus, Ukraine, the Baltic States. However, Russian culture in general is not limited to the Orthodox Church and the church. It has a liberal, socialist, technocratic, and other currents. Among young people Vedic direction is gaining momentum, which brings together various groups of modern pagans and rodnovery (Native Faith).
ALFRED VIERLING: How does Russia solve the problem of the present day managing of the huge Muslim population? The EU has not yet tackled this…
PAVEL TULAEV: This problem is not easy! In Russia live at least 20 million Muslims. Most of them inhabit the south of Russia, Tatarstan and the Volga. The number of citizens who practice Islam is growing in all major cities of our country, especially in Moscow, where two million Muslims have built new moskques. The peak growth of Islamic influence was in the 1990s, when a religious revival led to the wars in Chechnya and Dagestan. As you know, according to the Qur’an, a true believer in God should lead a holy war (jihad) against the “infidels.” This radical position is perceived by Christians as the Islamist extremism and terrorism. The Russian government has to take into account the interests of the dominant religions, including Islam, so it supports the policy of oecumenicalism, peaceful coexistence and dialogue between religions. In the Russian passport and national origin and faith cannot be specified. At the same time, it promotes a cosmopolitan culture in the form of variety, sensuality, all sorts of entertainment and recreation.
Security and energy
ALFRED VIERLING: The European Union does not have its own army and is occupied by NATO under U.S. military command. The European Union countries are forced to participate in U.S. wars, even in relation to European countries such as Serbia, creating Muslim enclaves in Bosnia and Kosovo, or to maintain the artificial revolutions, as in Ukraine, Georgia, Belarus and Kazakhstan.
Can Russia ensure the European Union sufficiently safe supplies of gas and oil so in order to enable Europeans to free themselves from the United States?
PAVEL TULAEV: Problems of security and sovereignty are not confined to energy policy, although it is one of the most important strategic factors. Of course, Russia can provide a reliable supply of the EU gas and oil. She is already doing so through the northern and central European pipeline, despite resistance from competitors. It must be borne in mind that there are other modern sources of energy such as nuclear power. They will grow, despite the recent accident in Japan. Europe’s dependence on U.S is rahter in militarily and more technologically and politically, rather than energy-wise. NATO helped Germany reunite, betraying the Soviet leadership, and now takes under its wing western parts of the former Russian Empire, including these into the European Union.
ALFRED VIERLING: What do you think of the Russian-European Union plan to ensure mutual security, earlier proposed by Gorbachev, and about Putin’s proposal in the spirit of the Treaty of Paris?
PAVEL TULAEV: The direction of the diplomatic effort to build a strategic axis Paris-Berlin-Moscow axis, it was generally correct. But by agreeing to concessions to Germany, it was necessary instead of opposing blocs of NATO and the Warsaw Pact to create alternative structures of collective security, such as the Northern Union. Unfortunately, Western strategists forced the Russian army to retreat eastward. Endless discussions about the program “Partnership with NATO”, are mere moves of military diplomacy. In this so-called “partnership” the U.S. waged local wars which it did not dare do so under its own name, to the obvious detriment of Russia. For example, the bloody partition of Yugoslavia. Tomorrow NATO swallowed Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia and other Slavic countries of Europe and they may invite us to “divide Ukraine.” This will be the next hook, followed by a new promotion of strategic weapons of the West to the East. It pushes Russia closely into the arms of China, but China has its own interests. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) may be a counterbalance to NATO, but Russia is squeezed in-between. As a result, there is a risk that fragments of the Soviet Union will become a bargaining chip, that is a victim of competition between two superpowers – the U.S. and China.
ALFRED VIERLING: All countries that have no debt to the banking system, the IMF (International Monetary Fund) are under threat. If the IMF has the tools of influence, as we see in modern Greece, it puts pressure on the country and brings it almost to bankruptcy, to the point of where the Anglo-Saxon banks are able to gain power over key primary resources.
PAVEL TULAEV: Indeed, today, as to the world’s banking systems not only small but also large countries are threatened. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has nodifficulty in destroying Greece, and then arrange the sale of its economic resources. The mechanism of financial and political power has long been realized. It is well known also that the state itself of the USA has long been in terrible financial debt to the bankers. Its total amount is calculated to astronomical figures and growing. As a result, dollars are not backed with gold, and gradually depreciate. However, the bankers and their well-paid analysts – are not fools. They will look more and more new to forms of protection of their interests. For example, after the euro can be introduced a transcontinental currency, AMERICO. Of these financial games the relatively well protected China by the features of its independent economy will survive with a strong Yuan.
If Russia is to ensure its security with China, it will further strengthen the threat of sinicization of the eastern regions of our country in the process.
The utopian promise of the future
ALFRED VIERLING: In the spirit of Guillaume Faye’s archeofuturism you return to the traditional European gods. You are the author of this book with pictures of gods who represent the origin of the Slavs as the Indo-Europeans. What have they taught you?
PAVEL TULAEV: I am well acquainted with Guillaume Faye, not only from books, but also personally. At my invitation he came to Russia again. Here we have published in Russian two books, “World Revolution. An essay on the new American imperialism” and “What are we fighting for?”, as well as several articles. I respect the author as a thinker and one of the most prominent ideologues of the New Right, but do not completely agree with him. My debate with Guillaume Faye is contained in the article “What we advocate?”.
The philosophy of “archeofuturism” of Guillaume Faye is close to me, because it is addressed to the future. However, the European gods, I learned not from him, and, in general, not from Western authors. Russia has had a fundamental school of Indo-evolved scholars by the end of the XIX century. Let me mention only the names of Alexander Afanasiev, Alexander Hilferding, Boris Rybakov, Oleg Trubachev. Studies of these and many other authors suggest that Eurasia for millennia been a single cultural space. The motion passed as people from north to south (Hyperboreans and Arians), and from east to west (the Scythians, the Wends and Slavs), and then from south to north (the Romans), and from west to east (the Germans).
Along with these peoples have developed the presentation of the gods. For example, the cult of the thunderer, well-known in the Western tradition under the name of Zeus and Jupiter, in ancient times has been widely distributed on the Danube and the Dnieper under the name of Perun. Odin (Votan) came to Scandinavia, from Asia Minor, after passing through northern the Black Sea region. The European cult of the Holy Trinity was first known in India as the Trimurti. The ethical teachings of the Buddha were also preceded by the gospel of Jesus Christ, by not a few centuries.
The Album published by me includes 230 artistic images of Indo-European gods, and has 14 contemporary artists. I am the author of a popular science introduction to the book and co-author of an academic explanatory dictionary (96 articles of the gods). In fact, this book – as an illustrated encyclopedia of the Slavic-Aryan mythology- is a wonderful gift for both children and adults.
After all, gods – are the living principles of existence of the universe. We receive them from a single organism, we have a common genetic line. Not only people and nations, but also the gods could be close or distant relatives. Awakening of the Gods – is not only a religious activity, but creating a quality environment for the creation of new worlds better than the current civilization.
ALFRED VIERLING: How did you come to the conclusion that our rebirth depends on the axioms “first blood of the soil” and “biopolitics before geopolitics?” As a saviour concept for our race and our earth?
PAVEL TULAEV: There are the obvious facts that some people will recognize, while others either do not understand or do not want to understand. Human races and types – are as much an objective reality, as the species of animals or plants. To deny the diversity of biological life forms – is silly. The white man – even in Africa remains white, brings to the exploitation of the land their civilization. A Black (black race) and in the European world is black, as in psychology, and culture. Contemporary African-American music in the U.S. constitutes a glaring example. The same thing happens with the Arabs, who carry with them the religion of Islam to Europe and engage in trade, rather than the advancement of science or technology. And also Chinese. Once in Russia, they study the Russian language for communication with the indigenous population and for business, but the Chinese keep their traditional culture: native language, philosophy, ethics, Eastern martial arts.
ALFRED VIERLING: Tell me frankly, what do you think of racial mixing?
Mixed racial types and their development in new social conditions constitute a special theme. However, at odds of 10:1 if we talk of the relationship between European and non-European populations on a global scale, it is no longer about crossing or complementarity, but about the absorption of the white minority overwhelmed by much more numerous races. Therefore, the genetic principle must be taken into account in strategic planning in the interests of national security. Biopolitics must prevail over geopolitics, because it is very important, who will live in our land, who will manage it, who will create new values and laws? Will here still be the rightful place for White peoples of our sacred culture?
Strategy and tactics
ALFRED VIERLING: How did you imagine, the “Aryan Revolution ‘?
PAVEL TULAEV: I would prefer to speak of Aryan Renaissance or Rebirth, rather than revolution. The latter term is usually associated with political events, while we are faced with spiritual, intellectual and educational tasks.
In general, this question is very complicated, so a brief response to all exhausted. First of all, we should understand that the term “Arya” in Sanskrit means a person worthy of respect, a smart person and committed to faithful tradition. In India, it may be a man or woman of some kind, usually belonging to one of the three ruling castes: Brahmins (priests), Kshatriyas (warriors), Vaishyas (traders, farmers and pastoralists). In the modern consciousness, the distorted propaganda of the media, this historical and scientific concept is associated with the theory of “Aryan race” in the Third Reich, which means the people of Nordic origin. Hitler and his destructive war discredited the idea of Aryan, as it belongs to the swastika (in Russian “Kolovrat” or “Yarga”), which means heavenly blessing, and to this day is one of the main symbols of Buddhism. So the first task is to separate the indigenous knowledge of ideological propaganda and Nazi policy, dispelling myths of the XX century.
The second fundamental problem constitutes a thorough study and development of the Aryan notion, as if to say in a scientific way – the Vedic tradition. The Vedas – are vast ocean of sacred knowledge. It’s not just the famous “Rigveda”, “Atharvaveda”, “Samaveda” which contain hymns of the ancient rishis (priests), but also “Ayurveda” (traditional medicine and the science of zdovove), the Upanishads (the philosophical and religious tracts), the richest body Puranas (sacred stories about gods, kings and heroes), the shastras (treatises on war, state of art). For spiritual growth, regeneration and prosperity of this knowledge (Veda), we need these Veda like the European science needed Hellenic philosophers Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle.
Spiritual knowledge (Veda) and the Aryan ethic will help us to consolidate the fraternal peoples of Eurasia, from Spain to India – on a positive basis (the traditional religion, a strong family, a healthy lifestyle, the teaching of the Dharma – the highest debt service). And ultimately, build a fair, efficient and technologically advanced society, what we ourselves want to be, rather than that imposed on us.
ALFRED VIERLING: What do you mean by tactics of “leaderless resistance? In the USSR, Stalin was as the tough leader needed to throw off Masonic conspirators and contain the spread of Islam: In 1917 , in the Soviet Union, at the disposal of 47 forty-seven million Muslims were 23 000 mosques. In 1989 80 million Muslims had only 300 mosques at their disposal.
PAVEL TULAEV: The term LEADERLESS RESISTANCE does not belong to me, but to Simson Garfinkel, an article by him we reprinted in “Athenaeum.” He describes the tactics of guerrilla warfare of a world network type, which is qualitatively different from the old system of political parties and trade unions, built on a pyramid.
I think that the leaders we need have all the qualities according to dedicated leadership theory, on which there are many publications. The question is, what exactly is meant by the leader. Führer of the old type (the speakers for the area and narcissistic dictators) – do not suit us. A wise leader operates on the principle of 道 dao “Tao”: he knows things, understands how things happen and gives what already has essentially been realized. He is like a midwife that takes an unborn child. He knows how to listen, not just talk. And knows how to make his ideas sound as if they were put forward by others. A good leader successfully operates in a team.
Stalin (Dzhugashvili) was indeed a very strong leader, so much he could do. However, do not deify him. He brought a lot of grief to the people of Russia, including the Russian nation, though, and flatterned her. Stalin destroyed not only the Freemasons, but all dissidents. During his personal dictatorship he has killed millions of people for their beliefs. Yes, the mosques in the Soviet Union were in magnitude smaller, but it was the same proportion in the destruction of Christian churches. The Communists were atheists, and fought against religion as such, it had nothing to do with Christian orthodoxy versus Islam.
Dictatorship doesn’t appeal to me. As a professional Hispanist I was interested in the experience of Generalissimo Franco, who ruled the country for 40 years! I have issued in Russia, his book “Freemasonry.” However, I do not worship Franco. Today it is impossible to return to the days of the Catholic Inquisition, and it is not desirable.
ALFRED VIERLING: You seem to think about the possibility of restoring the autonomy of ethnic revival in Russia and Russian people, by self-esteem, to ensure the independence of national sovereignty or even of its civilization?
PAVEL TULAEV: Indeed, I devoted much of my life to the Russian national liberation movement and understanding of contemporary problems of my people. We can say that in the 1990s of the XX century in Russia there was an information boom, which allowed us to talk about the Russian Renaissance. While this has led to the return of national cultural heritage, it did not consolidate into the formation of Russian statehood.
The fact is that today the Russian Federation is inhabited by representatives of 180 nationalities that make up 83 territorial entities. Together, they form, according to the Constitution, “the multinational people of Russia.” It is believed that the Russians are about 80% of all citizens, but our federation is not a nation state. The Russian people are not recognized as a legal entity, which is why there are many political conflicts and problems. However, the general direction of this movement is striving towards a homogeneous society with a clear lead of Russian and Slavic ethnic groups.
ALFRED VIERLING: Please tell us about the importance of strategy and tactics of the “Athenaeum” for the White Revival throughout the world.
PAVEL TULAEV: “Athenaeum” as you know, the tradition goes back to the temples to Athena – goddess of wisdom. In the Age of Enlightenment in all European countries there emerged as the centers of the Athenaeum of Arts and Sciences. Russia before the Revolution, had also a magazine called “Athenaeum.” Our publication was founded in 2000, and has as its main objective the development of strategy and the semantic fields (information space) in the new Rules. These are disruptive (that is, revolutionary in fact) as the direction of Native Faith, Raciologie, white culture, technology, conspiracy, World War IV. We are not conservatives or progressives, but as you surely noticed, archaeo-Futurists. That is our goal – the birth and upbringing of a qualitatively new entity the White Revolution, which will be able to provide leadership to a national avant-garde.
By combining the best minds of Russia and Europe, our “Athenaeum” is best known outside the country. This enabled us to organize in 2006 a conference on “The Future of White World”, and in 2007, “Russia and Europe” which was attended by eminent Western thinkers [such as Guillaume Faye, Pierre Krebs, Pierre Vial, Robert Steuckers, Enrique Ravelo , Jann-Ber Tillenon, Gerhoh Rayzegger, David Duke, Manfred Roeder, Silvano Lorenzoni, Stefonos Gekas, Chris Roman, Anton Rachev, and from us, Anatoly Ivanov, Vladimir Avdeev and others]. Proceedings were issued in Moscow and we published a multilingual web site http://www.ateney.ru
True, our ideological opponents don’t like the active position of the leaders of the new rules. They tried to discredit both the conference in Moscow, its members have been exposed to initiated legal proceedings against the publishers of ‘right-wing’ literature. I have reported widely about this in the statement, “Athenaeum under threat.”
ALFRED VIERLING: Let me ask, what has happened to the Athenaeum recently?
PAVEL TULAEV: Oh, it’s an unpleasant story. In Russia there is a law about the Media and so called “Extremism”. If some statement, that could be treated as extremists is published, then that material is confiscated and its name is included in the list of forbidden literature. It’s very bad news. It’s inquisition. As a result, some publications of the last issue of the Athenaeum, including a report from David Duke criticizing Jewish politics, have been declared extremist and banned for distribution, although they do not contain any incitement to violence, but only objective information.
I think it’s wrong. We organize conferences of scientists, seminars, we discuss stuff. It’s the freedom of thoughts. How is it possible to forbid the freedom of thoughts in the XXI century, when there is internet? This policy has no future.
ALFRED VIERLING: Is it possible to create the “Alliance of the White nations” to fend off the approaching Fourth World War? What are its characteristics?
PAVEL TULAEV: The name “Alliance of White nations,” can hardly be taken seriously for any inter-state union. When the organizing committee of this conference in 2006 discussed the name of the forum, the French and Germans insisted on the term “people of European descent” and not “white people”. Whatever it was, we formed a coordinating council, which operates in the free exchange of information and opinions. The real breakthrough in this direction was the creation of an organization of “Euro-Russia” led by Kris Roman. Through its website it regularly informs our partners about the main news on the continent and within the movement.
The persecution of free thought, illegal from the standpoint of Russian and international law, is precisely a form of the fourth world war. It is carried out not by only nations or states, but also by latent international organizations for the benefit of transnational companies and banks, with their subordinate media. Their goal is world domination by their weapons, money, violence and depravity. Humans, like animals, are driven into the golden cage of consumerism, from which they cannot escape. During this “sweet war”, millions of people each year are destroyed by abortion, alcohol, tobacco and other drugs. It is the ‘Stylists’ new world order, modeling desirable from their point of view human types as selfish, idiot , playboy , bitch-like creatures.
These degenerative phenomena again remind us of the Vedic teachings of the Kali Yuga. Is it possible to save all people in an apocalypse? In any case, modern idiocy, and slavery in all its forms, that is what we must confront with our spiritual awakening and knowledge, without which there cannot be a true elite of reasonable humanity.
ALFRED VIERLING: Dear Pavel, I sincerely thank you for such thorough answers to my questions.

PAVEL TULAEV: Thank you, dear Alfred for coming to Russia, for this interview. And I hope our Friends from EuroRus would cooperate with us, learn about Russia, understand Russia and search for ways of cooperative peaceful building. We are not extremists, we represent the European Civilization and Culture. We want peace, so that our nations would prosper.


The conversation as spoken on the interview:

1. Демография

Вопрос 1.1. В 2050 (две тысяча пятидесятом) году народы европейского происхождения будут на грани исчезновения, cоставив менее 6 % (шести процентов) от мирового населения. Коэффициент рождаемости в Европейском Союзе и в России в настоящее время составляет 1.57 (одну целую и пятьдесят семь сотых). В то время, как возобновляемый коэффициент, необходимый для стабилизации численности населения, равен 2.1 (двум целым и одной десятой). И в Европейском Союзе, и в России отдельно уже около 30.000.000 (тринадцати миллионов) мусульманского населения, уровень рождаемости которого намного выше.

Answer 1.1. Yes, we know about this alarming statistics and we understand the tendency. About muslim population of rest Europe – you know this situation better. In Russia the situation is also quite alarming, so i share your worries and the necessity to rethink this problem, when the world’s europeoid population is about 8%, and is to become even less – 6%. It’s a very dangerous tendency.

Вопрос 1.2. Европейский союз намерен увеличить мусульманскую иммиграцию на двадцать два миллиона африканцев, в то время как Россия, как мне кажется, стремится остановить неевропейскую иммиграцию.

Answer 1.2. In Russia the stream of legal and illegal immigrants is raising and the government and Prime Minister Putin had to limit quotes for immigrants from Asia. But this quote was reduced very little, the stream of Asian immigrants is still very big, they come legally and illegally. I think in future this problem will still stay.

Вопрос 1.3. Это правда, что правительство России предоставляет родителям около 18000 (восемнадцать тысяч) евро за каждого второго и третьего ребёнка?

Answer 1.3. No, I think this amount is false. There are dotations, but they are much smaller. I don’t know the accurate sum, but it’s about 30 thousand roubles (1000-2000 euros maximum). In rest Europe – in Germany, Norway, Sweden dotations are much bigger. We have to aspire dotations level of these countries to support the family.

Вопрос 1.4. Вы автор книги «Белая борьба в России» (Москва, 2007 две тысячи седьмой год). Что вы писали там?

Answer 1.4 The book “White Struggle in Russia” was released in a limited edition and is published in PDF format in my personal web-site http://www.tulaev.ru. This book is a collection of my articles and interviews in English, French, German and Spanish. The idea of this book – to show all european people, that we, Russians, also belong to the same civilization, that is called – The White World or European Civilization. We have the same roots, our religion is very common, almost the same, same education, traditions e.t.c. But in political aspect we have different points of view. And that’s normal. We also share the values of the White World, European Values and we are also fighting for them. And that’s not because of the West’s influence, it’s our problem.

Вопрос 1.5. Будет ли население России, как ожидается, восстановлено в количестве около 150 (ста пятидесяти) миллионов человек в 2030 (две тысячи тридцатом) году, и сможет ли служить демографическим резервуаром (Hinterland) и источником вдохновения для вымирающих белых людей в Европейском Союзе?

Answer 1.5.Dear Alfred, unfortunatelly it is an illusion. Russia’s population won’t be 150 million people, because nowadays there is a reduction of population – depopulation. The depopulation is about a million people in a year. There are different statistics, different demographical researches, but for the time of liberal reforms Russia’s population has decreased for about 15 million people. It’s a very alarming statistics. Russia is a reservoir of White population, but the quantity is decreasing and the quality also worsens. People’s health becomes worse.

2. Цивилизация и культура

Европейский Союз был подчинен власти США (Соединенных Штатов Америки). Oн ослаблен американской «чумой удовольствий», что приводит к индивидуалистическому стилю жизни, который укоренился в обществе. В интересах своих масонских кругов американское лобби пытается ослабить евро-зону, проповедуя мультикультурализм. Это превращает население европейского происхождения в меньшинство на своей собственной земле, окруженное морем мусульманских и негритянских иммигрантов. В связи с подъемом националистических партий во всех государствах-членах Европейского Союза недавно такие государственные лидеры, как Саркози во Франции, Меркель в Германии и Камерун в Британии вынуждены были признать провал мультикультурной политики. Однако, после их признания, всё пока остается по-прежнему.

Вопрос 2.1. Может ли Россия предложить альтернативу мультикультуре?

Answer 2.1. Of course, we know about this leader’s speaches, that the multicultural politics were wrong, it lead us to a tragedy. We know what have become such towns as London, Paris, Brussels like. These are no more European towns, they remind nowadays of Washington or New-York. All people have rights for their originality, but only at their homelands. If people move to another land, they must feel themselves guests. But people from Asia, Africa, Latin America come to big towns and create their own culture inside. And that’s why we have to take laws, that would regulate the proportions of how much and in what forms different cultures could be presented, not to dominate the original. In Russia we have such an experience – one great big culture and many smaller cultures of native peoples, with whom we live in friendship. This requires not only people’s will, but also corresponding laws. For example – Russian culture in Russia is about 80%, that’s why the Russian culture in Russia has rights to be the title culture, the official state culture and not equal to any smaller mini-culture And mini-cultures have rights for their autonomies. The culture of Ghana is good on the territory of Ghana, but in Paris Ghana’s culture is a different thing. Islam in Iran and in London is a different thing.

Вопрос 2.2. Какова роль Русской Православной Церкви в восстановлении традиционного образа жизни семьи и возрождении русской цивилизации как основополагающей культуры?

Answer 2.2. I want to thank you for reading in Russian, it’s very hard for a beginner, but it’s our pleasure, that you study Russian. Thank you! The role of the Orthodox Church in Russia in consolidating. The church defends the family, the russian culture and takes the consolidating role in the country. Many russian philosophers are based on orthodox philosophy – Ilyin, Berdyaev, Solovyov, Losev. And Russian Idea is – Consolidation, Love in God – brotherhood based on religion. Generally it’s a positive idea, but in Orthodox Christianity there are different branches. There is a conservative, enlightment and reaction braches. I sympathise more to the folk orthodox and to the church, that defends interests of family. We are against tendencies in the vein of inquisition, bans and so on. Also there is a Vedic movement in Russia, but that’s a different topic.

Вопрос 2.3. Как Россия сегодня решает проблему управления огромным мусульманским населением?

Answer 2.3.In Russia the muslim population is quite high – 20% or 30%. In Russia there are several big dominant religions – Orthodox Christianity, Catholicism, Islam, Buddhism, and the government promotes the policy of religious cooperation, because when religiosness becomes extremist and radicalistic, as it was in Chechnya, Dagestan, Tatarstan, where the most people are muslims, it leads to tragedy, to war. And that must be a warning to Islam not to stand to the way of djihad and terrorism. And most of muslims are not extremists.


3. Security and Energetics

3. Европейский Союз не имеет своей армии и оккупирован НАТО. Он находится под военным командованием США. Страны Европейского Союза вынуждены участвовать в американских войнах даже в отношении европейских стран, таких как Сербия, создавая мусульманские анклавы в Боснии и Косово, или для поддержания искусственных революций, как это было в Украине, Грузии, Белоруссии, Казахстане.

Вопрос 3.1. Может ли Россия обеспечить Европейский Союз с достаточной безопасностью надежными поставками газа и нефти, чтобы европейцы могли освободить себя от США (Соединенных Штатов Америки)?

Answer 3.1. It’s a very serious question. There is such a conception, as Energetic Security, and Russia, as a large energetic state, has already suggested it’s strategy to Europe – Northern Way oil and gas pipeline through the Baltic Sea and Europe shall be interested in this, because in this case it doesn’t have to in muslim countries and despite the tragedy that occurred in Japan, Nuclear Energetics is still being developed. I know that in Germany and France Nuclear Energetics is highly developing and this is unstoppable. As for the revolutions, it is important to have USA’s no invention to European countries. For example – Serbia, it’s a horrible violance, Belgrade’s bombing is a catastrophe and reminds me of Dresden’s bombings. It’s unfair.

Вопрос 3.2. Что вы думаете о Российско-Европейском союзном плане для обеспечения взаимной безопасности, предложенном Путиным в духе теперь забытого Парижского договора, предложенного раньше Горбачевым ?

Answer 3.2. When the USSR was the second state in the world (there were 2 super states – USA and USSR), Gorbachev suggested an agreement of Europe’s Security – Helsinki Agreement. Today it’s forgotten and I think we shall return to it. Russia has always played one of the leading roles in Europe’s life. There is a strategy of geopolitical axes – Paris-Berlin-Moscow, transcontinental axes. I would add Madrid also, and, maybe, Delhi, so it would be Transaryan axes. I have friend Chris Roman, who is the founder of organization EuroRus, that declares this idea – security of European People against invasion from without. Would it be Islamic terrorism or invasion of China or USA. We don’t need being bombed.

Вопрос 3.3. Все страны, не имеющие задолженности перед банковской системой МВФ (Международного валютного фонда) находятся под угрозой. Если Международный Валютный Фонд имеет инструменты влияния, как это мы видим в современной Греции, он оказывает давление на страну и доводит её почти до банкротства, чтобы англосаксонские банки смогли получить власть над основными ресурсами.

Answer 3.3. I’ve studied the history of bank structures influence to politics, and IMF is not the only bank, that does politics, there is also International Bank and other, less famous financial structures. The system of bank credits with high percents is very dangerous for the international economics. Many countries were bankrupt because of this financial influence. For example – Russia, Ukraine. The next in line or Greece. If there is a default in Greece, it would reflect on all Southern European countries. It’s a dangerous tendency. That’s why we have to strengthen other currencies. Euro depends on Us Dollar, but not absolutely depends. There is also a currency – Rouble, it is a bit unstable, but is to become strong. Chinese strengthen their yuan in the Asia. We, Europeans, need to provide our financial security.

4 Утопическая перспектива будущего

Вопрос 4.1. В духе археофутуризма Гийома Фая вы возвращаетесь к традиционным европейским богам. Вы автор книги с картинами богов, которые представляют происхождение славян как индоевропейцев. Чему они вас научили?

Answer 4.1. Dear Alfred, thank you for showing this album to the audience. My friends and I declare the conception of roots. There is a theory of Archetypes in science, archetype is also a root. A tree can’t grow without roots, and that’s why, our friend Guillaume Faye says about Archeofuturism, that we have to grow up with the support from the roots. The book “Native Gods in Slawic artists’ works” is an album with 184 images of Slawic Gods and a dictionary. Why is it so important to us? Because Gods are like principles of being. It’s a Myth, that gives us notion about the past, the present and the future. If Science explains, than Myth shows. It help us to get into the depth of our memory. I like arts and I support arts. In the book there are reproductions of 14 artists. People from the street are interested, go the exhibition, they watch the paintings and they like it. And they think, why do I like this, why am I interested in this? Just because it is my native, natural.

Вопрос 4.2. Как вы пришли к выводу, что наше возрождение зависит от аксиомы «кровь прежде почвы», а «биополитика прежде геополитики»? Чтобы cпасать нашу расу и наш земной шар?

Answer 4.2. You see, saying about blood we don’t mean literally blood. The blood is genetics, a kind, a race. And soil – is a territory, where we are. Common Sense shows, that if the White man is in Africa, he still stays White man. First of all not by the color of the skin, but by his mentality, behavior. And he creates White Civilization in Africa, for example – South Africa. And if a Black man goes to Europe or America, he creates his culture there. First, he sings spirituals, than Jazz and than he makes a disco in the vein of his native music.

Question 4.3. What do you think about race-mixing?

Answer 4.3. You see, it’s a hard question. In 1-2 generations, there is a new race created – mulattos and mongrels. I was studying South America – mulattos or mongrels in Chile or Argentina are not Indians. The president of US Obama is not Afro-American, he is a mongrel. They have good education, they are Africans no more, they represent a new culture. We need to be politically correct in these questions. We have to learn to understand them, but they also have to respect our culture. We hear African music from our radios, but I’ll doubt that in Africa they listen to Tchaikovsky, Sviridov and Glinka. Racial soul lives in the same body, in which it was born. In other body the soul changes.

5 Стратегия и тактика

Вопрос 5.1. Как вы себе представляете «Арийскую Революцию»?

Answer 5.1. I would prefer to speak about Aryan Rebirth, not revolution. Because there is a political myth, when people hear the word Aryan, they immediately associate it with Hitler. It’s disinformation and lies. Aryanism is reality. Indo-Aryan culture is one of the richest cultures. We research Slavic-Aryan ancientry. In India there is very rich Indo-Aryan heritage, for example – Vedas, Puranas. I regularly read Puranas, they have recently been translated from Sanskrit into Russian. We learn and this is normal. I think Vedic culture will influence Europe as much, as Greek philosophy of Aristotle and Plato has influenced Western Europe. But this will take a while.

Вопрос 5.2. Что вы подразумеваете под тактикой «безлидерского сопротивления» (leaderless resistance)? В СССР был вождь Сталин, чтобы выбросить масонских заговорщиков и сдерживать распространение мусульманства. В 1917 (тысяча девятьсот семнадцатом) году в Советском Союзе в распоряжении 47 (сорока семи) миллионов мусульман было 23 000 (двадцать три тысячи) мечетей. В 1989 (тысяча десятьсот восемьдесят девятом) году на 80 (восемьдесят) миллионов мусульман приходилось лишь 300 мечетей. В КНР был «великий кормчий» Мао, чтобы избавиться от западного колониализма.

Answer 5.2. It’s two different issues. What about Stalin, than he certainly was a very strong leader, but he brought not only the ideas of social equality and communism, but also lots of grief, tragedy and misery. Millions died from Stalin’s struggle against dissent people. Stalin fought not only Islam, but also Christianity, lots of temples, mosques and synagogues were destroyed. Soviet regime was atheistic, but nowadays there is a different situation. The leader has to be understanding. Like in Dao. The leader understand people and lets them fulfill themselves, this is the real leadership.

Вопрос 5.3. Вы, кажется, думаете о возможности восстановлении автономии России и возрождении этнической самооценки русского народа, чтобы обеспечить независимость или даже превосходство национальной цивилизации?

Answer 5.3. Self-consciousness of Russian people has already formed. Russian nation realizes itself as a nation. There are books, movies , music that depict Russian spirit. We have a very long history, 1000 years of statehood. But Russians lost their state in 1917, at that time the USSR was founded and Russians don’t have their country anymore. It’s a very hard question, and it’s not clear, how it would be solved. All other nations – Tatars, Chechens and even Jews have their autonomies and republics.

Вопрос 5.4. Пожалуйста, расскажите о значении стратегии и тактике «Атенея» для Белого Возрождения во всем мире.

Answer 5.4. It’s a very important question for me. As you know, I’m the founder of The Athenaeum. The Athenaeum is associated with the traditions of Athena Temples – The Goddess of Wisdom and Fair War. She is our Patron. We develop strategy of rebirth not only of Russian people, but the whole Europe. We called this strategy – Fourth World War. It’s an opposition to the new forms of aggression. First of al, it’s intellectual opposition. The most important thing is idea. How one thinks, the same way he is acting. That’s why we develop such important things as Native Faith, Racial theory, eugenics, within the pale of laws, of course. We are not attacking, we are defending. This is the challenge of time and we have to answer this call. To learn, to understand – it’s the mission of Athenaeum. We held the conference “The Future of the White World”, that gathered many intellectuals, philosophers, publishers and leaders of the White World and all of them presented their point of view. There is a document that says, that people from European nations have to understand each other to build a general strategy: http://www.ateney.ru

Вопрос 5.5. Возможно ли создание «Альянса Белых наций», чтобы сопротивляться приближающейся Четвёртой мировой войне? В чем её особенности?

Answer 5.5. Alliance of White Nations nowadays is hardly probable. Though, there are majorly representatives of European countries in the Big Eight. Even the Bilderberg Group consists majourly of White People. We are the bearers of new ideas, and our alternative exists as intellectual club. In this case we are the White Resistance. Not VIP, Very Important Persons, but Really Important Persons.

Question 5.6. Let me ask, what has happened to the Athenaeum recently?

Answer 5.5. Oh, it’s an unpleasant story. In Russia there is a law about the Media and Extremism. If some statement that could be treated as extremists are published, than that material is confiscated. It’s a very bad news, it’s inquisition. There is a list of forbidden books and one issue of our magazine, the last issue about conference Russia-Europe is got to the list. It’s absolutely an academic issue. They’ve found some statements that possibly could be interpreted out of the context as extremists. I think it’s wrong. We organize conferences of scientists, seminars, we discuss stuff. It’s the freedom of thoughts. How is it possible to forbid the freedom of thoughts, when there is internet?! This policy has no future.

6. Уважаемый господин Тулаев! Искренне благодарю Вас за столь основательные ответы на мои вопросы. Авось, нам повезёт и мы побываем везде где нашей душе угадно!

6. Very good! Dear Alfred, let me thank you for coming to Russia, for this interview and I hope our Friends in Europe, especially such people as Chris Roman, the founder of EuroRus, would cooperate with us, learn about Russia, understand Russia and search for ways of cooperative peaceful building. We are not extremists, we represent the European Civilization and Culture. We want peace, so that our nations would prosper. Hail the friendship of European Nations and my deep gratitude to you!!! Hails!


Antaios, spiritual sources of Europe (Steuckers)

Leave a comment

Interview with “New Antaios”


Who are you? What’s the main purpose of your “New-Antaios” project? And why do you refer to the mythological figure of Antaios? Is it a revival of Jünger’s and Eliade’s Antaios or an English counterpart of the former Antaios journal of the Belgian novelist Christopher Gérard?

I was born in Agram (a German name for the city of Zagreb) in Croatia just over 42 years ago. I have lived in Zagreb during the times while my country was occupied by Yugoslav communist regime led by dictator Josip Broz Tito. There I have studied Political Sciences at the University of Zagreb and later on Philosophy and Psychology at Hrvatski Studiji, University of Zagreb. I have studied as well at Universities in Scandinavia, United Kingdom and Germany. I am coming from a family which is of an ethnic German heritage.

Antaios is uniting Earth and Sea, soil and water without whom both there is no life. Antaios father was Poseidon, the God of Sea and mother Gaia of the Earth. Antaios or Antaeus in Greek means as well ‘’against’’ so in this way ‘’The New Antaios’’ is in cultural and philosophical terms set to make an intellectual bulwark against that what is destroying Our European culture, tradition, heritage, folklore and with that ultimately our roots.

Journal ‘’The New Antaios’’ is the continuation of the original ‘’Antaios’’ Journal of Mircea Eliade and Ernst Jünger so we can say it is a revival albeit the Journal will/is as well reflecting on all that is happening in these postmodern times. Hence Journal represents what I call ‘’Postmodern European thought’’ and as such serves primarily as an outlet for the postmodern philosophers and thinkers.

I do respect and highly admire Christopher Gerard and his work on Antaios in years from years 1992 to 2001. Like Gerard I dislike New Age teachings and don’t have any interest in TraditionalistSchool. The New Antaios is made of four sections which are making the whole Journal. First part is ‘’Plethon’’ the name I gave after the Byzantine Hellenistic philosopher George Gemistos Plethon and articles in that section are related to Hellenism, Heathenism in a scholarly way. Contributions will be made as well by certain authors from Asatru background. Heathenism and Heithni comes from the Old Norse word heiðni which was used to describe the pre-Christian spiritual beliefs and practices of the Northern European peoples. The word Heithinn (or Heathen) comes from the Old Norse word heiðinn, an adjective to describe the ideals of Heithni (ex. Heithinn ethics – those ethics which conform to Heithni), or as a noun to describe those who live by the ethic and world-view of Heithni (ex. He is Heithinn, those people are Heithnir [plural]). Heiðni also means ‘high, pure, clear’ in Icelandic language. Word also describes person who is a dweller in place in the nature. Postmodern Heathens are those people who are reviving and revitalizing the tradition through serious study, research and dedication combined with the worship of the Gods and Goddesses or just simply in a way of their thinking without the ritual worship part. Personally I am keen of combining the two in a proper and balanced way. Second section is ‘’Aesthetic Vedanta’’ named after the book by Swami Bhaktivedanta Tripurari Maharaja, Western teacher of ancient tradition of Gaudiya Vaishnavism. Aesthetic Vedanta section deals with Hindutva, Hinduism,Vaishnavism and Gaudiya Vaishnavism exclusively. Third section is ‘’Suncovrat’’ a Croatian archaic word for the Solstice and deals with pre-Christian cultures which existed prior to Christianization of what makes nowadays Republic of Croatia. Fourth section is the main section of the Antaios Journal.

I would further like to point out that Christopher Gerard has no input whatsoever and isn’t in any way associated or affiliated with this new Journal. That is why the journal has prefix ‘’The New’’ to clearly mark difference with previous two journals. As far as I know Gerard’s Journal ceased to exist just on the turn of the century hence prefix ‘’The New’’ is completely appropriate here. While it will preserve and retain the original idea and concept with due respect to previous editors and directors of the Journal, it will be updated with short blog style texts, proper academic articles and essays which reflect on and take a critical eye of current state of affairs in different areas of philosophy, politics, culture, art, tradition, science and these postmodern times .

What was the maturation process of your worldview? Has it to do with Croatian politics or not?

I would say that I have spiritual and political Weltanschauung complementing each other. I was brought up in a family whose background is Christian albeit my late grandfather and my late father were both reading authors like Nietzsche and Jünger and considere themselves to be Pagans. I was brought up on stories from ancient Greece and Old Norse and Germanic tales whom my friends in school didn’t even hear about. My own father was a Heathen. He wrote small and up until now unpublished treatise on what he calls ‘’Raan’’. In this book Raan is knowledge of the Gods and Goddesses who once in previous Yugas did visit our planet. In this work he is influenced by Nietzsche’s and Heidegger’s philosophy.

After spending years at the University in Croatia studying Political sciences in Zagreb I went to become a monk in Gaudiya Vaishnava tradition. The reason for that was again in the Family. During the mid to late 80es my family got interested in Gaudiya Vaishnavism so I started reading and studying different books of Vedic knowledge like Upanishads, Puranas and Bhagavad Gita. I have discovered in mid 90es about Traditionalist School, Rene Guenon and Julius Evola. In years to come I have been reading and studying about diverse cultures, traditions of Europe and parallel with that I got initiated in the Traditional Gaudiya Vaishnavism while travelling to one of my spiritual pilgrimages to India.

Hence as a result, my own spiritual belief system would be Traditional Gaudiya Vaishnavism, while I permanently study and read about Indo-European beliefs of our ancestors, Ostrogothic pre-Christian beliefs, Old Norse, Hellenic and Germanic pre-Christian belief systems and Mithraism. Vedic knowledge in my opinion is very important key to unlock many secrets of the European tradition itself. In line with that I very much admire Hindutva writers such as Sita Ram Goel and Ram Swarup, Indian historian Bal Gangadhar Tilak , contemporary scholar from Belgium Dr. Koenraad Elst as well as Alain Danielou who are all big influence. Next influence would be primarily my own teacher Sri Ananta das Babaji Maharaja by whom I was directly initiated in Parivar or Traditional line which goes back many centuries ago, then authors such as: Sri Kunjabihari das Babaji Maharaja (who is the direct teacher of my own teacher Ananta das Babaji Maharaja), Kundali das, Binode Bihari das Babaji and Sripad Bhaktivedanta Tripurari Swami Maharaja whose certain books and teachings are in my opinion the Gaudiya Vaishnava answer to Traditionalist school. There should be veneration of our ancestors together with the firm belief in divine origins of Our Ancestral lines, veneration of Nature and veneration of the Gods and Goddesses which are part of our European Identity. Perhaps it would be the best to quote here another great influence of mine, Dominique Venner: ”To live according to tradition is to conform to the ideal that incarnates, to cultivate excellence according to its standard, to rediscover its roots, to transmit its heritage, to be in solidarity with the people who uphold it. ”

Croatian politics were influential to my worldview and perhaps it would be better to give a bit of background explanation from the not so well known Croatian history. Certain people would like such knowledge to remain hidden as such. In my opinion Croatian people have a unique position in Europe. There are people who label Croatia Western Balkans which is a complete nonsense. According to what I was reading from diverse sources Croats aren’t only just Slavs and are mixture of Slavenized Germanic tribes, Celtic tribes, Illyrians, ancient Romans, ancient Greeks and Indo-Persians. Over the span of more than half a century Croat academics and researchers who were proclaiming such theories were executed or ‘’disappeared’’. Persecutions started in times of the monarchist Yugoslavia up to late 80es of 20th century in the communist regime. Names like Haraqwati and Haraxvati which paleographic expert Dr. Kalyanaraman has found were names of the tribes, etnonymes which clearly show how early we can find about Croatian origins. Places where such names were found were part of Bharata Varsha or what is today India. Archaeologists have found along names emblems and coats of arms which look very much similar to Croatian coat of arms with the twenty – five field “chessboard”. In a similar way the remnants and artefacts were also found when those tribes have moved from what is today India to Persia and those names can be found in 6th century before Christ in places like Bagistan and Persepolis and also with ancient peoples like Hurrwuhé. Ancestors of today’s Croats were worshippers of Saraswati Goddess of Vedic India (Goddess of learning, arts and music) and from her name comes originally name Hrvati. Croats are therefore known as Hrvati, Haravaitii, Arachosians or Sarasvatians, descendants of the ancient inhabitants of the Harauti province & the Haravaiti or the Sarasvati River. The recent hravati /hrvati [sic] hence comes from haraxvaiti and earlier spelt as haraquati (arachotos, arachosia, araxes). Sarasvati is the river and Arachosia being the region.” Their mention is as well on the legendary inscriptions of Darius the Great. Early Croatian pre-Christian religion was derived from primordial Persian Sun-worship. Even the Croatian word for tie is kravat(a) which is again another connecting word.

Furthermore, the name of the Croatian capital, Zagreb, is related to the Zagros mountain range of Iran. The Dinara mountains in Dalmatia may be connected to Mount Dinar (Dene) of Iran. When the tribes came to what is nowadays Croatia they have mingled with the numerous local Slavic (or Slavenized Germanic tribes) tribes and adopted the Slavic language from them. Meanwhile after the collapse of the Hunnic Empire Croats organized the local Slavs into a state and gave them their national name. Before the invasion of the Avars ca. 560 the White or Western Croats created along with the Antes a great state extending north of the Carpathians from the upper Elbe to the upper Dniester. (35: Niederle, 263-266; Dvornik, The Slavs, 277-297) R. Heinzel is of the opinion that the Carpathians of the old Germanic Hervarsaga took their name from the Croats who called them the Harvate mountains i.e. Croatian mountains. (36: Heinzel, 499; Dvornik, op. cit., 284, sq.)” (Mandic 1970, Ch.1)

There are similarities in folklore as well. “There are old Croatian customs and national poems that have been cited as evidencing lingering traces of the fire and sun worship of the Persians. Fire, the essence of human origin, the sun, and the great boiling cauldron around which the warriors spring in the age old kolo or circle dance, all these are ingredients in the national lore of the Croatian nation. The Croat vilas or fairy witches resemble the peris of Iranian mythology. Then there is the legendary Sviatozov, the personification of strength, a being almost too huge for the earth to bear. He is strongly reminiscent of the “elephant-bodied” Rustum of Persian legend.” (Guldescu 1964, pt.1.II) “It should be noted that only the thesis of the Iranian origin of the Croats can explain the name “Horvath”, the title of a Croat dignitary Banus, the names “White” and “Red Croatian”, and the Bogumile phenomenon (like Cathars in Occitania). According to this theory, the Croats were a branch of the Caucasian Iranians, who lived somewhere in the western Caucasus during the era of the Roman Emperors. The Caucasian Anten were another branch of this group.” (Dobrovich 1963)

Research shows clearly everything what I have written and quoted above to be the truth although some oppose that theory as they want to preserve artificial Panslavism , idea of Yugosphere ( the idea for the 3rd united Yugoslavia without Slovenia and with Albania) under the guise of ‘’Western Balkans’’. In Croatian language there is an excellent word I really like: ‘’Samosvojnost’’. Samosvojnost means Identity in Croatian language. In my opinion Croatian identity should and must be preserved only through the independent republic of Croatia or as it is now. Hence Croatia does not need any new unions. Friendship yes, but union definitely not.

Serbia on the other hand would like to establish themselves as a regional leader. They play with naive Croatian government and Croatian president Josipović while behind their back they lobby in EU to make what was once war in ex-Yugoslavia look as a ‘’civil war’’ and accuse Croatia who were defending themselves . They do have some allies and friends in Europe who would like to see them as the leaders in the region. Those allies on the other hand actually don’t consider Serbia as a friend but as a tool for their own means and nothing else. It is a travesty of justice to see Croatian generals such as Gotovina and Markač to be sitting in Hague so just that Croatia can get a green light for EU so that bureaurocrats in EU they can say that ‘’all sides’’ were equally responsible. I would like to ask the question then. What about the people and country of Croatia which was invaded, whose homes are burned and destroyed? According to that ‘’theory’’ Croatians should not have been defending themselves as they were supposed just to sit and wait to be erased from the face of this planet.

Croatia has been suffering since demise of Austria-Hungary. It wasn’t good for Croatians either to be in any previous unions but union with Serbs has proven to be so far the worst one. Union with Austria-Hungary was far from perfect but at least we were in a monarchy which had culture and tradition. Croatian people don’t need anything anymore other than their own independence and peace with the neighbouring nations.

How the time is passing by I am less and less interested in Croatian politics. As a result I won’t be writing in Croatian language anymore since there is no purpose for it. I will rather use and invest my energy, effort and time for something I think will yield certain results than to write constantly for something what will anyway reach just a handful of people or just completely wither away. I have learned that from an example of the members of the ‘’Croatian Historical Revolution’’. Over the years I have read articles by leading Croatian intellectuals and scholars such as Dr. Tomislav Sunić then Dr. Jure Georges Vujić, prof. Amir Riđanović, prof. Petar Bujas (all members of Croatian group similar to G.R.E.C.E. – Arhelinea – http://www.arhelinea.com ) Dr. Zoran Kravar, then Croat republican conservatives such as: Tomislav Jonjić, Mario Marcos Ostojić, Hrvoje Hitrec, Croatian scientists such as : Dr. Vitomir Belaj, prof. Tomo Vinšćak, Dr. Radoslav Katičić, and prof. Mario Kopić and Dr. Hrvoje Lorković (of whom we can’t hear these days what is a real tragedy since Dr. Lorković is one of Croatian important intellectuals). Croatians should be happy to have such giants of free thinking yet many in Croatia don’t even know about some of them. That is for me completely bizarre. If one is carefully reading articles and books by above mentioned intellectuals and scholars one can only see that many of them are actually disillusioned with the current state of Croatia altogether. That is evident even from their articles. Hence as a result of that Zoran Kravar is not interested in any kind of politics neither he wants to be or get involved (yet he is one of authorities on Ernst Jünger in Croatia) same is with prof. Tomo Vinšćak as well, while others like Mario Kopić and Dr. Tom Sunić are publishing their new books outside of Croatia because there is hardly any interest in their ideas in Croatia. It seems that Dr. Jure Georges Vujić will publish his new books as well outside of Croatia. That is unavoidable since Croatians are lethargic in finding new solutions in political dialogue or any kind of new political ideas. They would rather stick to something what is completely falling apart while thinking that ‘’it would get better’’. I have a best friend in Croatia whose political ideas are in minority and while he wants betterment in any spheres of Croatian life (including politics and his fight against corruption) he doesn’t have as much support as he actually would and should get. It is the apathy and lethargy which are deeply rooted in certain parts of Croatian nation (thankfully not all of it) with its roots in the fear of change and political and historical lower self-esteem (which is really uncalled for, since Croats have such rich history, tradition and culture of whom they should be absolutely proud of) . The question they often ask themselves is: ‘’ What would happen if things change? ‘’ and because of constantly repeating that question they are indeed unable to make any significant change. I believe firmly that in the forthcoming parliamentary elections Croats will elect again some party or coalition of parties which will not bring nothing new to already stagnating Croatian political scene. In the right as well as left and centre there is nobody who could potentially have a quality for the deep changes Croatia needs desperately. In the right side of spectrum and as well on centre and left one can just see political opportunists in Croatia who long for their seat in parliament (called Sabor in Croatia) or certain position. That is their goal before anything else I am afraid, of course my humble bow to those politicians who aren’t like that and are in significant, significant minority.

My own political interests nowadays evolve around Eurocontinentalism and European Identitarian Communitarianism. Even though I do speak Croatian language I consider myself first and foremost an ethnic German with Prussian mentality, after that I am an European.

Eurocontinentalism in this case represents strong continental Europe which stands between USA and Great Britain on one and Russia on the other side. The question of Europe here is not just a matter a blood; it is spiritual, historical and cultural phenomenon.
This further quote actually explains some of my thinking on the matter: ‘’Implicit in this view is the assumption that the body is inseparable from the spirit animating it, that biological difference, as a distinct vitality, is another form of spiritual difference, and that the significance of such differences (given that man is a spiritual being, not merely an animal) is best seen in terms of culture and history rather than nineteenth-century biological science. American “white racialists” with their materialist-technical conceptions of race actually diminish the significance of the Racial Question by reducing it to a simple matter of genes, biology, equations….’’ ( Mladikov – The Phora Forum)

Dominique Venner is in my opinion the greatest influence for the Eurocontinentalism and my own political Weltanschauung with his writings, articles and books. In Croatia some of his books are available as well.

His thoughts describe the best what I think further:

‘’ The idea that is made of love is no more frivolous than the tragic sense of history that characterizes the European spirit. It defines the civilization, its immanent spirit, and each person’s sense of life, in the same way the idea shapes one’s work. Is the sole point of work to make money, as they believe across the Atlantic, or, besides ensuring a just return, is it to realize oneself in a job well done, even in such apparently trivial things as keeping one’s house. This idea urged our ancestors to create beauty in their most humble and most lofty efforts. To be conscious of the idea is to give a metaphysical sense to “memory.”

To cultivate our “memory,” to transmit it in a living way to our children, to contemplate the ordeals that history has imposed on us–this is requisite to any renaissance. Faced with the unprecedented challenges that the catastrophes of the twentieth century have imposed on us and the terrible demoralization it has fostered, we will discover in the reconquest of our racial “memory” the way to respond to these challenges, which were unknown to our ancestors, who lived in a stable, strong, well-defended world.

The consciousness of belonging to Europe, of Europeanness, is far older than the modern concept of Europe. It is apparent under the successive names of Hellenism, Celticness, Romanism, the Frankish Empire, or Christianity. Seen as an immemorial tradition, Europe is the product of a multi-millennial community of culture deriving its distinctness and unity from its constitutive peoples and a spiritual heritage whose supreme expression is the Homeric poems. ‘’

To read further perhaps I would recommend this article (and as well all other articles by Dominique Venner) : http://www.counter-currents.com/2010/06/europe-and-europeanness/#more-881

What were your main sources of inspiration?

I have mentioned some of them above. I would say that Ernst Jünger, Dominique Venner and Nicolás Gómez Dávila are the most significant and important influence for me personally simply because they complement each other perfectly and in my own opinion they represent the true European Tradition which Ram Swarup, Sita Ram Goel, Alain Danielou and Koenraad Elst represent in Hindu Tradition. Apart from them other authors, thinkers and philosophers I would say first of all I feel especially close regarding ideas and Weltanschauung are : Croatian thinkers and members of the ‘’Croatian Historical Revolution’’, Classical philosophers such as : Emperor Julian the Apostate, Porphyry, Celsus, Platonis Sallustius, Libanius, Julius Firmicus Maternus, Iamblichus, Gemistus Pletho(n) and other such philosophers, Erik von von Kuehnelt – Leddihn, Croatian philosopher prof. Mario Kopić, prof. Robert Steuckers, certain ideas of Alain de Benoist, certain ideas of Dr. Guillaume Faye, Dr. Georges Dumezil, Dr. Jan Assmann, Mircea Eliade, Emile Cioran, Alain Danielou, German greatest living poet Rolf Schilling, Oswald Spengler, Carl Schmitt, German Romanticism period authors and artists, Felix Dahn, Antoine Saint du Exupery, certain ideas of Julius Evola, Norwegian composer Geirr Tveitt, composers Arvo Part and Johannes Brahms, Felix Mendelssohn, Sibelius, Ralph Vaughan Williams, postmodern musical projects such as Triarii, Arditi, In Slaughter Natives and new project Winglord, artists such as Ludwig Fahrenkrog, Karl Wilhelm Diefenbach, Fidus, Caspar David Friedrich, Hermann Hendrich, Franz von Stuck, Carl Larsson, John Atkinson Grimshaw, Jean Béraud and others.

Who are the main Croatian thinkers according to you and that are completely ignored in the rest of the world? How could we discover them?

Main and most influential Croatian thinkers were: Dr. Milan von Šufflay, Dr. Ivo Pilar, Dr. Vinko Krišković, Dr. Filip Lukas, Dr. Julije (Julius) von Makanec, Dr. Stjepan Buć and authors involved with journal ‘’Spremnost’’ : prof. Tias Mortigjija, Dr. Milivoj Magdić, Dr. Ante Ciliga & Dr. Vilko Rieger (Dr. George W. Cesarich) . Influential are also early works of prof. Ivan Oršanić, Dr. Ivo Korsky, then author Ivan Softa (Croatian Knut Hamsun), national poet Jerko Skračić and a few others. It is very hard for somebody in Europe to discover them as their works were burned, destroyed and left to be forgotten by Yugoslavian and Serbian communist regime. Back in 1970es of 20th century for just reading the works of these authors, philosophers and thinkers one could get a lengthy prison term and that would be of course if you did find their books somewhere. I am collecting their works wherever I can find them and that is in most cases extremely hard and on top of that some of their books command very high prices. Situation is not like with authors of Conservative Revolution whose works remain saved and translated to many languages now. Most of the above mentioned people were brutally murdered by either Serbian Monarchist regime who ruled the first Yugoslavia or by communist regime who ruled Yugoslavia and occupied Croatia after the year 1945.

At this point in time there is no translated literature in any of other languages except the book ‘’Southslav question’’ written by Dr. Ivo Pilar (under pseudonym Dr. Leon v. Südland) which was printed at the beginning of the 20th century in Vienna originally in German language. Book was never reprinted again either in German or English (or any other foreign language) and was translated in Croatian language and has since been in print only twice. Copies of both editions are virtually impossible to find. Books of other authors are not being reprinted at all. I really don’t know if that is because of the economic crisis in Croatia since many members of Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) turned out to be crooks and thieves who were stealing money from their own country and country’s resources. It has been going on like that for a long time and no government (even the coalition of liberals and social democrats which lasted for 4 years) didn’t make situation any better or because there is no interest in those books and those authors at all. It is partially because of many Croatians were killed and murdered from 1944 to early 1950es by communist regime (and in years after that up to 1990 just prior to war in Croatia) and because of the mentality which became a norm since 1918, after Croats lost the war as part of Austria-Hungary. Dr. Ivo Pilar did warn Croatians about those kinds of problems especially in two of his books. One of those books was above mentioned ‘’Southslav question’’.

I am afraid that the only way to discover them will be through book I am currently writing and subsequently I will translate some of the most important works by Šufflay, Pilar, Lukas, Krišković, Makanec, Mortigjija and Magdić. I will start with works of Dr. Ivo Pilar and Dr. Milivoj Magdić whose works I am collecting at the present time. I am putting together Dr. Milivoj Magdić’s and dr. Ivo Pilar’s articles and smaller important works and will include one very informative article about Milivoj Magdić’s life done by one Croatian historian. Dr. Pilar’s book ‘’Southslav question’’ will be most likely the first one to surface followed by Dr. Magdić’s collected works. It is very interesting to mention that Dr. Ivo Pilar and Dr. Milivoj Magdić had both the biggest private libraries in the city of Zagreb and most likely in Croatia at that time. I have heard that currently Alain de Benoist has one of the biggest private libraries.

So we can talk about a genuine Croatian “Conservative Revolution”?

Croatian Historical Revolution was a German Conservative Revolution’s and France’s Ordre Nouveau’s counterpart. It strikes me how there wasn’t anybody in Croatia trying to compare German Conservative Revolution with all these authors we have had. My guess is that certain levels of academia in Croatia have some sort of inferiority complex and lower self-esteem. Except post modern Croatian intellectuals and academics I have mentioned above (and most in this group were living, studying and teaching for some time outside of Croatia) other Croatian intellectuals constantly behave in a way which has ruined indescribably reputation of Croatia. Members of Croatian Historical revolution were totally opposite. Partially that is because they grew up in Austria- Hungary and partially because up until year 1918 influence of Balkan ‘’culture’’ wasn’t predominant in Croatia and our gene pool wasn’t almost destroyed as it is the case today (holocaust of Croats and ethnic Germans from years 1944 -1950es). Most of the people who today want any kind of communism to be back in Croatia are leftovers of previous regime and they are not even Croats by their genes or in spirit.

Members of CHR (Croatian Historical Revolution) have had experience with different ideologies and transformations as the ones in Germany. They rallied for the Croatia as an integral part of Europe and how some of them called it at the time ‘’Bieli Zapad’’ (White West). Like authors in German counterpart they have produced diverse works such as philosophical treatises, political journalism, manifestoes which have outlined their ideas for the transformation of Croatia and role of Croatia in Central Europe and Europe altogether. They were strongly opposing liberalism and even liberal democracy and they have rejected despiritualization and commercial culture. They advocated new conservative thought which was inspired by Croatian national patriotism. I find their ideal very much connected with ideals of German Conservative Revolution members and nowadays with prof. Dominique Venner.

How could we connect Croatian authors with their other European counterparts? Who are the Croatian authors that should be read together, beyond every language barrier?

My opinion is that all the works of the above mentioned members of the Croatian Historical revolution are very much worth exploring, studying and reading. They all do come highly recommended albeit due to totalitarian and primitive backwards communist regime headed by Josip Broz Tito and his blind followers lots of original writings are lost , destroyed or are very rare to that extent that only Croatian National Library may have only one copy or original of each of the original works of the members of the Croatian Historical Revolution. None of those works were translated in any languages (as I have mentioned above) except Dr. Pilar’s ‘’Southslav question’’ which was originally written in German and then translated to Croatian. Dr. Ivo Pilar was speaking and writing as Dr. Milan v. Šufflay and many other members of CHR, in several languages. In those times after the I WW it was quite normal for people of Croatia to speak German as a second and in many cases as their mother language together with Croatian language. Hopefully in time through my own ‘’ Hyperborea Press’’ which is the part of Somnium Media all the main works of the members of the Croatian Historical Revolution will surface and be translated in English language. As always one has to be realistic, as with any of such efforts good will isn’t enough, I will have to invest money and time into this project in a balanced manner.

Do you see original viewpoints or bias by these Croatian authors that you cannot find back in the works of their other European counterparts?

I know that I risk now sounding a bit vague but most of their viewpoints are similar or identical with their German and French counterparts, although one of their main focal points or focus was naturally fight against the repressive Serbian monarchist regime and its imperialistic hegemony. I have written recently some articles about this topic. I believe that I will answer much broader to this question in my book about Croatian Historical Revolution.

What are your projects for the near future?

The New Antaios Journal’s further development is my priority and alongside with TNAJ there is ‘’Eurocontinentalism Journal’’ and my own ‘’Somnium Media’’ website which offers music, merchandise and books which are serving as an alternative to world of mass consumerism we live in. Great help in that effort is my dear friend mr. Zvonimir Tosic who is an editor in chief and managing webmaster of The New Antaios Journal and Somnium websites. The New Antaios and Eurocontinentalism Journal will both have some interesting interviews and articles in months to come. Somnium Media imprint ‘’Hyperborea Press’’ will publish most significant works of members of the Croatian Historical revolution and hopefully some works by Nicolas Gomez Davila.

Further related to ‘’Hyperborea Press’’ I have plans for the three books and three translations. First one is above already mentioned book about Croatian Historical Revolution and its members and it will be an overview of the significance of Croatian Historical Revolution and works of its members and authors not only for Croatia but for Europe and European thought as well. Another book is ‘’ Gaudiya Vaishnavism – The Living and Timeless Tradition ‘’ which will explain how important Traditional Gaudiya Vaishnavism is (a belief in Hinduism) not only for Hinduism but for the resurgence of Indo – European thought in general. I know that Dr. Alexander Jacob has written extensively on the topic of resurgence of Indo-European thought but his emphasis is not like in authors such as Georges Dumezil , Jan de Vries, or Ram Swarup, Sita Ram Goel and Alain Danielou in Hinduism or ancestral pre-christian beliefs. Rather he uses as an example for restoration of Indo –European thought resurgence of European Medieval Christian noble spirit of ‘’archaic and brave’’ and Prussian noble spirit. In my own opinion the best starting point for such study would be a Saxon epic ‘’Heliand’’.

Traditional Gaudiya Vaishnava thought in this book will serve as an alternative for the Traditionalist thought which was espoused by Guenon, Schuon and other Traditionalists. Third book deals with Croatian pre-Christian and pre-Slavic legends and it delves in times of the heroic Croatian past. I have contacted one still living Croatian author who gave me information on stories and its characters which obviously have roots in pre-Christian and pre-Slavic times of Croatia. It is quite a work and a huge challenge to reconstruct those tales and to find out and connect certain characters. Some shortened versions of those stories I will be presenting at certain Storytelling Fairs in Ireland during the summer. Three translations will be my most likely first translation work on the new book by Dr. Jure Georges Vujic (which will be his first book in English language) followed by translations of two books of the members of the Croatian Historical Revolution, Dr. Ivo Pilar’s ‘’Southslav question’’ and Dr. Milivoj Magdić’s best and collected works complete with my own explanations and commentaries. I will also continue writing for Brett Stevens’s Journal on line http://www.amerika.org which is with Europa Synergon one of the most interesting journals to be found on line.

Thank you very much Robert for the opportunity you gave me with this interview and as well thank you for your influence on my own thought which is indispensable and very important. I would also like to thank to anybody who has read this interview and found it interesting or just thought provoking.

(interview taken by Robert Steuckers, late spring 2011).

Correct Halal rapport/report

Leave a comment

Nederlands rapport

English summary

Brown Un.report: USA wars since 9-11: 365000 doden, $4,4 miljard

Leave a comment

De oorlogen die de Verenigde Staten zijn begonnen na de terreuraanslagen van 11 september 2001, hebben aan zeker 225.000 mensen het leven gekost. Ongeveer 365.000 mensen zijn gewond geraakt en bijna 8 miljoen mensen uit Irak, Afghanistan en Pakistan zijn op de vlucht geslagen.

Dat hebben wetenschappers van de Amerikaanse Brown Universiteit berekend. Vooral burgers lijden onder het geweld. In Irak en Afghanistan zijn zeker 137.000 burgers omgekomen, aldus de ,,zeer voorzichtige schatting” van de onderzoekers.

De kosten van de strijd kunnen oplopen tot 4,4 biljoen dollar (3 biljoen euro).

The Costs of War Since 2001- Iraq, Afghanistan, And Pakistan – June 2011 – Brown Universityhttp://www.scribd.com/embeds/59009632/content?start_page=1&view_mode=list&access_key=key-5adgj0wo9welat52og0(function() { var scribd = document.createElement(“script”); scribd.type = “text/javascript”; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = “http://www.scribd.com/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js”; var s = document.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })();

War Criminal Albright opens ‘Institute for Global Justice’ in The Hague

Leave a comment

This new Institute founded by the The Hague Academic Coalition (Carnegie Institute, Institute Clingendael, Universities of Leyden and Rotterdam) is meant to absorb, sorry to cooperate with the fore-mentioned and should find its place among the International Court of Justice and the Permanent Court of Arbitrage in the Peace Palace, the International Criminal Law Court, the UN Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and Interpol.

Madame Madeleine Albright, who was the former US American secretary-of-state, during the illegal bombardments on Serbia and as such a war criminal, is member of its board. She played earlier a pernicious role in blaming the Serbian population for what was in fact muslim attacks around Srebrenica. She also has been pivotal in setting up stories dd 10 august 1995 conniving with Christian Science Monitor's journalist David Rohde about pretended 'secret mass graves of mulsim people' like in Nova Kasaba (where only 33 unidentified dead bodies have been found) and about presumed Serbian transports of dead bodies from Bosnia to Serbia without ever presenting any evidence. This is certainly not an exhaustive list of her mischiefs. Worst may be that she has been crucial in appointing the judges at the international criminal law tribunal for former Yugoslavia and has been implied as member of the Clinton administration in the total war against Yougoslavia, up to the denouncements of Milosevic, Karadic and Mladic, denying their constructive roles in peace broking, above which the Clinton administration preferred to go to war and bombed Yugoslavia killing 4000 innocent people, to say the least.

see for her role as a USA amdassador to UN:Greg Copley in videoseries 'Yugoslavia, the avoidable war' by Bodawich & Lerttmayer an d in it the interview with UN envoy to the UK David Hannay on http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5860186121153047571#docid=-8513742796942621470
( I did not embed coz the interview runs over several parts to be found at the site herefore-mentioned); you rather read the article in combinaison with my other article on Mladic on this website. Read also the free on line book: The Srebrenica Massacre: Evidence, Context, Politics by Edward S. Herman and Phillip Corwin. Read ' NATO Crimes in Yugoslavia, documentary Evidence 24 march-24 april 1999,part I and II, Belgrade may 1999.)

She and mayor of the Hague J. van Aartsen. who was dutch minister of foreign affairs during these bombings were ostentatiously present during the inauguration of the institute. It makes it immediately clear, that this new think tank is bound to serve the masonic Bilderberg group ideas of conquering the world by rendering it infeodated to its banking system and by destroying the etnic tissues of countries not yet weakened by multikulti and multiracial immigration policies.

The Hague does not have any institute anymore, where continental thinkers, promoting the institutionalisation of Europeo-Russian nordic cooperation in stead of being propelled by an atlantic anglo-masonic orientation, can blossom. All students with some natural European pride will already be halted at the bachelor's degree level and rejected as 'nationalist extremist'.

I can foretell, that the new think tank will continue to preach soft war tactics like monetary and electronical wars, either short of or including physical bombardments against all states not yet infeodated to the USA international terror police state, like Albright did wage against Serbia, breaching ther entire building of peace treaties of international public law, without even any UN resolution. She is simply a war criminal and that does not predict anything good about the intention of the new institute.

One can ask whether the dutch tax payer forced to spend 17,5 million on this initiative should rather have spent it on an "institute for local Justice'. Albright did create two muslim states in Serbia (Bosnia and Kosovo); van Aartsen is transforming the population of the Hague in muslim people, organising naturalisation ceremonies for the veiled women. Asylants from islamist states are welcomed and are responsible for tremendous tensions in the very segregated town of THe Hague. For instance, Duindorp quarter is threatened by the influx of Somalian people. A dutch Court recentely did exonerate all charges against the leadership of the SHAM Foundation, responsible for the accomodation of asylants, although condemned by a tribunal for derouting about 17 million euro.

It is clear, that the upper class of The Hague, is totally de-rooted, trying to lick itself into international positions within the American empire, while ruthlessly exposing its own local people to a multiracial multicultural chaos. You can incarcerate Milosevic, Karadzic, Mladic and declare them responsible for genocide, but sooner or later the European people wil discover that it is them, who are on the verge of extinction (in 1950 just 6% of world population), and decimated on purpose by the very spirit of the initiators of the new institute, that continues to propagate racial and cultural mixtures for ther lower classes of Europe, (while other elites don't: China, South-Amerika, Arab world, Hindu world).

Older Entries